Obama’s Iran Deal Surrender Confirmed
Among the many promises made by the Obama administration after the framework nuclear deal was announced in April was a commitment to insisting that Iran come clean on all its past work on military dimensions of its nuclear project. Secretary of State John Kerry explicitly promised that Iran had to provide all this information to the West before the final version of the agreement could be put on paper and signed prior to the June 30th deadline. Though it was feared that President Obama’s commitment to getting a nuclear deal at any price would lead to such an important aspect of an agreement being jettisoned, we were reassured that the administration would stick to its demands. But now it appears that those promises were worthless. As the Associated Press reports, U.S. and Western diplomats are now saying they “are prepared to accept a nuclear agreement with Iran that doesn’t immediately answer questions about past atomic weapons work.” That leaves us wondering what other concessions are also imminent and whether Congress will consider, as it should, this abject surrender to be a sufficient reason to reject the pact when it comes before them for approval.
Lest there be any doubt about the administration’s promise to get Iran to open up about its military work, here’s what Secretary of State John Kerry said about the issue in an interview on PBS’s News Hour with Judy Woodruff on April 8:
Woodruff: Still, another issue; the International Atomic Energy Agency has said for a long time that it wants Iran to disclose past military-related nuclear activities. Iran is increasingly looking like it’s not going to do this. Is the U.S. prepared to accept that?
Kerry: No. They have to do it. It will be done. If there’s going to be a deal; it will be done.
Woodruff: Because it’s not there now.
Kerry: It will be done.
Woodruff: So that information will be released before June 30th, will be available.
Kerry: It will be part of a final agreement. It has to be.
What makes this surrender so appalling is that it is just the latest of a long string of Western concessions to Iran. At every point during the last two years of negotiations, the United States has backed down on key demands on allowing Iran the right to enrich uranium, the scale of the nuclear infrastructure it is allowed and virtually every other vital aspect of the issue. Whereas in the fall of 2012, President Obama was promising Americans during his foreign policy debate with Mitt Romney that any deal would involved the end of Iran’s nuclear program, by this year that position had evolved to one that granted it the right to go on enriching uranium and keeping thousands of centrifuges spinning in an agreement that would expire after a set number of years rather than constituting a permanent stricture on Tehran’s ability to produce a bomb.
The reason for these concessions was explained away by claiming that the original demands were unrealistic and that a deal that didn’t include them was better than no deal at all. That appears to be the same dynamic that is driving the West to back down on Iran revealing its past military work.
FOR ENTIRE ARTICLE CLICK LINKClick here for the Top 12 Moments in Jewish History...LET THE ADVENTURE BEGIN! »