EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE MUSLIM KAMIKAZE EGYPTAIR’S FLIGHT 804 PILOT
More evidence is arising to show that the pilot of Flight 804 went suicide. People ask: if indeed the pilot went suicide ‘Muslim Kamikaze style’, why plunge the aircraft loaded with mostly Muslim passengers into the sea and how does that make any sense from an Islamic perspective on Jihadi martyrdom?
But allow me to make my case first. Remember we still have the mystery of flight MH370 that disappeared without a closure. Some parts of the wreckage was found in the ocean. Shoebat.com back on December 30, 2014 reported: “A former Boeing 777 pilot has claimed missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 could have only veered off course due to sabotage.” “Is it a coincidence that this track managed to avoid Indonesian, Thai and then Indian military radar?” one Boeing 777 pilot asked. He also stipulates for air traffic control to lose secondary radar contact with MH370 someone would have had to interfere with the systems.” And as far back as March 14, 2014, Shoebat.com reported: “Sources told Reuters that the flight path of an unidentified aircraft, which investigators believe was MH370, followed a route with specific navigational waypoints, suggesting someone with aviation training was at the helm.” Last year, on April 16th, 2015, the BBCreported Captain Simon Hardy’s analysis of flight MH370 asking the questions that no one can answer:
HE’S CONVINCED ABOUT SOMETHING THAT NO PILOT, NO PASSENGER, NOBODY IN FACT WANTS TO THINK IS POSSIBLE – THAT THE CAPTAIN OF THE FLIGHT, ZAHARIE SHAH, DELIBERATELY HID THE PLANE FROM RADAR AND FLEW IT THOUSANDS OF MILES OFF COURSE, BEFORE IT CAME DOWN IN THE OCEAN. HE SAYS THE CLUES ARE IN THE ROUTE IT TOOK AFTER IT VANISHED FROM AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL. IT TURNED BACK ON ITSELF AND FLEW ALONG THE BORDER OF MALAYSIA AND THAILAND. “IT FLEW IN AND OUT OF THE COUNTRIES EIGHT TIMES,” HE SAYS. “THIS IS PROBABLY VERY ACCURATE FLYING RATHER THAN JUST A COINCIDENCE. AS BOTH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS IN BOTH THOSE COUNTRIES WOULD PROBABLY ASSUME THAT THE AIRCRAFT WAS IN THE OTHER COUNTRY’S JURISDICTION AND NOT PAY IT ANY ATTENTION … “WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED,” DAVID LEARMOUNT, SAFETY EDITOR AT FLIGHT GLOBAL, HAS SAID OF MH370. “THERE’S ONLY ONE THING IT CAN BE – ADELIBERATE ACT BY SOMEONE ON BOARD, PROBABLY THE CAPTAIN.”
The “captain” is very likely to be the culprit, especially if he is Muslim. And this is not only the views of Hardy and Learmount, this view gained momentum, especially that the Australian investigators describe Hardy’s theory as “credible”.
We have been saying this way before all these researchers. This is no “conspiracy theory” but is the most plausible scenario. Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah has been identified by Malaysian police as the prime suspect. Hardy spent six months analysing the known MH370 data and concluded that the plane was:
“INTENTIONALLY LANDED ON THE INDIAN OCEAN AND SANK INTACT JUST 20 NAUTICAL MILES (37KM) OUTSIDE THE CURRENT SEARCH AREA.”
“landed” and “sank intact” instead of crashing, is perhaps a clue, perhaps not to an aviation expert, but an expert on the rules of Islamic martyrdom.
This would be us. Since 2014, we had stated to expect this type of soft crashing will occur over and over and over. And just like Muslim Jihadis will plunge planes into the Twin Towers, it will take years before the West say “Islam and the Kamikaze have much in common,” but with a little caveat, in Islam, landing on water is crucial Jihadi theology (more on that later).
First of all, a flaperon was found from MH370 and it does not rule out Hardy’s theory and in fact supports it. This is one piece that will roughly hit the water and come loose. No matter how you land on water, ask any pilot, it is no soft landing.
But what Hardy was not aware of, is that in Islam, it is not only the warrior in battle who is considered “martyr”. Hardy’s theory is most likely true (I do not trust the aviation experts from Muslim nations). The pilot, Mr.Shah, on MH370, as well as Muhammad Shakeer of Egypt Flight 804, were designing a meticulous plan, not just on how he weaved through all the detection, but he must have meticulously considered his fate: drowning. On Flight 804, we know that usually the pilot takes control on takeoff and before landing. The incident of flight 804 was the latter, just when there is a switch.
And it is here that we come to the source, the mind, the theology and from our own experience as x-terrorist. It is difficult for westerners to comprehend the mindset unless they’ve been there and done that and sat in class in Bethlehem where our Muslim Brotherhood teacher Sheikh Zacharia would tell us of the benefits of dying drowning. In Islam, most Muslims know (which most westerners are oblivious to), when a Muslim dies by drowning, he is automatically considered a “martyr” and is perhaps why Shah, like Shakeer of flight 804 “landed” on water. Death due to an impact on a building spoils the recipe where Muslim passengers would lose that status. Under the classification of martyrdom in Islam, it clearly states:
“… HE WHO DIES OF A STOMACH DISEASE IS A MARTYR; AND HE WHO IS DROWNED IS A MARTYR.” [Sahih Muslim].
What is also conclusive, is that Captain Shah, like Shakeer of Flight 804, was Muslim fundamentalist.
Shah was an activist fighting for the release of his Islamist Malaysian opposition politician Anwar Ibrahim, who has been jailed on sex charges that his supporters (including Shah) say are trumped-up. Here Ibrahim can be seen with the top spiritual guide of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. And below that, Shakeer, the pilot of Egypt flight 804 can be seen with his friend Amr Khaled, a major Islamic Jihadist who is also linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Amr Khaled: “I was with Captain Mohammed Ahmad Shakeer in the plane that is missing in one of my journeys. He is the kindest of pilots whom I travelled with. May Allah have mercy on him and give patience to his family. I hope who reads my words to pray for him and the rest of the passenger”
Shakeer’s link to Amr Khaled, just like Shah’s link with Anwar Ibrahim should raise some serious alarm bells. Both Ibrahim and Khaled are linked to their love to the Muslim spiritual leader, Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.
Anyone can click to see the man is a Muslim Brotherhood operative. He openly aided and abetted terrorists. Both Shah and Shakeer are Islamists. A suicide act is not considered terrorism by the West. But they better start adjusting their policies. Although Shah’s drowning and most likely Shakeer’s was intentional, many will object, “suicide” they say is forbidden in Islam.
But this is incorrect when you add in the theology of an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.
This is one discussion amongst Islamists which the West are ignorant about. Westerners need to remember, Islam, its students, its fascination, its goals, everything about the religion is linked to stories in the past. A Muslim is an elephant who never forgets the past history. When I was Muslim, the story is known of the suicide of 700 Muslims on a ship which they deliberately sank and committed mass suicide.
Why suicide? Instead of surrendering the ship to Richard The Lionheart, they chose to poke holes in it and drown with it. They were considered “martyrs”. All one has to do is read the works of the famed terrorist, Anwar Al-Awlaki’. Al-Awlaki was finally killed by an American drone. He tells the story:
“IF THE INTENTIONS OF THE MUSLIM ARE GOOD AND FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH THEN HE [THE ONE WHO DROWNS]IS A shaheed [MARTYR]WHETHER HE DIED BY THE ENEMY OR BY HIS OWN HANDS. IT IS THE INTENTION THAT COUNTS … SALAHUDEEN COUNTED THE  CASUALTIES AS MARTYRS IN THE PATH OF ALLAH.”
Many of the silly comments I get, comes mostly from naive Americans who ask “why kill Muslims on board”? This is rather a stupid question, especially when these Americans who ask have witnessed 911. The pilots in the Muslim view are actually doing their passengers a favor. They are assuring their salvation since they died by drowning, all who drown are “martyrs” and are assured paradise.
Under the Muslim jurisprudence of Muruna and “the necessities of the group,” the spiritual head of Egyptian Islamists, Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi himself explains:
AS SHARIA CONSIDERS THE INDIVIDUAL NEEDS, IT PERMITTED MANY PROHIBITIONS AND CONSIDERS THE NECESSITIES OF THE COMMUNITY.
Qaradawi is not short of examples and even commands the “killing of Muslims whom the unbelievers use as shields”:
LEAVING THESE UNBELIEVERS IS A DANGER TO THE MUSLIMS, SO IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO KILL THESE UNBELIEVERS EVEN IF THEY KILLED MUSLIMS WITH THEM IN THE PROCESS.
Only the stupid in Egypt is unaware of all this. Everyone who is Islamist knows this jurisprudence.
These two flights are not the only ones in which
FOR ENTIRE ARTICLE CLICK LINKClick here for the Top 12 Moments in Jewish History...LET THE ADVENTURE BEGIN! »